This paper gives a new perspective on the theory of principal Galois orders, as developed by Futorny, Ovsienko, Hartwig, and others. Every principal Galois order can be written as for any idempotent in an algebra , which we call a flag Galois order; and in most important cases we can assume that these algebras are Morita equivalent. These algebras have the property that the completed algebra controlling the fiber over a maximal ideal has the same form as a subalgebra in a skew group ring, which gives a new perspective to a number of results about these algebras.
We also discuss how this approach relates to the study of Coulomb branches in the sense of Braverman–Finkelberg–Nakajima, which are particularly beautiful examples of principal Galois orders. These include most of the interesting examples of principal Galois orders, such as . In this case, all the objects discussed have a geometric interpretation, which endows the category of Gelfand–Tsetlin modules with a graded lift and allows us to interpret the classes of simple Gelfand–Tsetlin modules in terms of dual canonical bases for the Grothendieck group. In particular, we classify the Gelfand–Tsetlin modules over and relate their characters to a generalization of Leclerc’s shuffle expansion for dual canonical basis vectors.
Finally, as an application, we disprove a conjecture of Mazorchuk, showing that the fiber over a maximal ideal of the Gelfand–Tsetlin subalgebra appearing in a finite-dimensional representation has an infinite-dimensional module in its fiber for .
Revised:
Accepted:
Published online:
Keywords: Gelfand–Tsetlin module, weight module, Coulomb branch
Webster, Ben 1
@article{ART_2024__1_3_393_0, author = {Webster, Ben}, title = {Gelfand{\textendash}Tsetlin modules in the {Coulomb} context}, journal = {Annals of Representation Theory}, pages = {393--437}, publisher = {The Publishers of ART}, volume = {1}, number = {3}, year = {2024}, doi = {10.5802/art.14}, language = {en}, url = {https://art.centre-mersenne.org/articles/10.5802/art.14/} }
TY - JOUR AU - Webster, Ben TI - Gelfand–Tsetlin modules in the Coulomb context JO - Annals of Representation Theory PY - 2024 SP - 393 EP - 437 VL - 1 IS - 3 PB - The Publishers of ART UR - https://art.centre-mersenne.org/articles/10.5802/art.14/ DO - 10.5802/art.14 LA - en ID - ART_2024__1_3_393_0 ER -
Webster, Ben. Gelfand–Tsetlin modules in the Coulomb context. Annals of Representation Theory, Volume 1 (2024) no. 3, pp. 393-437. doi : 10.5802/art.14. https://art.centre-mersenne.org/articles/10.5802/art.14/
[1] Koszul duality patterns in representation theory, J. Am. Math. Soc., Volume 9 (1996) no. 2, pp. 473-527 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[2] Hypertoric category O, Adv. Math., Volume 231 (2012) no. 3-4, pp. 1487-1545 | DOI | Zbl
[3] Towards a mathematical definition of Coulomb branches of 3-dimensional gauge theories. II, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., Volume 22 (2018) no. 5, pp. 1071-1147 | DOI | Zbl
[4] Coulomb branches of quiver gauge theories and slices in the affine Grassmannian, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., Volume 23 (2019) no. 1, pp. 75-166 | DOI | Zbl
[5] Introduction to complex reflection groups and their braid groups, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1988, Springer, 2010 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[6] Shifted Yangians and finite W-algebras, Adv. Math., Volume 200 (2006) no. 1, pp. 136-195 | DOI | Zbl
[7] Boundaries, mirror symmetry, and symplectic duality in 3d gauge theory, J. High Energy Phys., Volume 10 (2016), Paper no. 108 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[8] Representation theory and complex geometry, Birkhäuser, 1997 | MR | Zbl
[9] Harish–Chandra subalgebras and Gelfand-Zetlin modules, Finite-dimensional algebras and related topics (Ottawa, ON, 1992) (NATO ASI Series. Series C. Mathematical and Physical Sciences), Volume 424, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994, pp. 79-93 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[10] Canonical Gelfand–Zeitlin Modules over Orthogonal Gelfand–Zeitlin Algebras, Int. Math. Res. Not., Volume 2020 (2020) no. 20, pp. 6947-6966 | DOI | Zbl
[11] The Hodge theory of Soergel bimodules, Ann. Math., Volume 180 (2014) no. 3, pp. 1089-1136 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[12] On the Category of Harish–Chandra Block Modules (2023) | arXiv | DOI
[13] Singular Gelfand–Tsetlin modules of gl(n), Adv. Math., Volume 290 (2016), pp. 453-482 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[14] Gelfand–Tsetlin modules of sl(3) in the principal block, Representations of Lie algebras, quantum groups and related topics (Contemporary Mathematics), Volume 713, American Mathematical Society, 2018, pp. 121-134 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[15] Bounds of Gelfand–Tsetlin multiplicities and tableaux realizations of Verma modules, J. Algebra, Volume 556 (2020), pp. 412-436 | DOI | Zbl
[16] Gelfand–Tsetlin theory for rational Galois algebras, Isr. J. Math., Volume 239 (2020) no. 1, pp. 99-128 | DOI | Zbl
[17] Galois orders in skew monoid rings, J. Algebra, Volume 324 (2010) no. 4, pp. 598-630 | DOI | Zbl
[18] Fibers of characters in Gelfand–Tsetlin categories, Trans. Am. Math. Soc., Volume 366 (2014) no. 8, pp. 4173-4208 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[19] Finite-dimensional representations of the group of unimodular matrices, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, n. Ser., Volume 71 (1950), pp. 825-828 | MR | Zbl
[20] Nil–Hecke algebras and Whittaker -Modules, Lie Groups, Geometry, and Representation Theory, Springer, 2018, pp. 137-184 | DOI | Zbl
[21] Equivariant cohomology, Koszul duality, and the localization theorem, Invent. Math., Volume 131 (1998) no. 1, pp. 25-83 | DOI | Zbl
[22] Principal Galois orders and Gelfand–Zeitlin modules, Adv. Math., Volume 359 (2020), Paper no. 106806 | DOI | Zbl
[23] On category O for affine Grassmannian slices and categorified tensor products, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., Volume 119 (2019) no. 5, pp. 1179-1233 | DOI | Zbl
[24] Lie algebra actions on module categories for truncated shifted yangians, Forum Math. Sigma, Volume 12 (2024), Paper no. e18 | DOI | Zbl
[25] A diagrammatic approach to categorification of quantum groups. I, Represent. Theory, Volume 13 (2009), pp. 309-347 | DOI | Zbl
[26] A diagrammatic approach to categorification of quantum groups. II, Trans. Am. Math. Soc., Volume 363 (2011) no. 5, pp. 2685-2700 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[27] Extended graphical calculus for categorified quantum sl(2), Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 1029, American Mathematical Society, 2012 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[28] Representations of Khovanov–Lauda–Rouquier algebras and combinatorics of Lyndon words, Math. Ann., Volume 349 (2011) no. 4, pp. 943-975 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[29] Quantized Coulomb branches of Jordan quiver gauge theories and cyclotomic rational Cherednik algebras, String-Math 2016 (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics), Volume 98, American Mathematical Society; International Press, 2018, pp. 49-78 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[30] Dual canonical bases, quantum shuffles and q-characters, Math. Z., Volume 246 (2004) no. 4, pp. 691-732 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[31] Rational Cherednik algebras of from the Coulomb perspective, Adv. Math., Volume 433 (2023), Paper no. 109295 | DOI | Zbl
[32] Personal communication
[33] Orthogonal Gelfand–Zetlin algebras. I, Beitr. Algebra Geom., Volume 40 (1999) no. 2, pp. 399-415 | Zbl
[34] Harish–Chandra modules over invariant subalgebras in a skew-group ring, Asian J. Math., Volume 25 (2021) no. 3, pp. 431-454 | DOI | Zbl
[35] Gelfand–Tsetlin Bases for Classical Lie Algebras, Handbook of Algebra, Volume 4, Elsevier, 2006, pp. 109-170 | DOI | Zbl
[36] Invariants under tori of rings of differential operators and related topics, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 650, American Mathematical Society, 1998 | DOI | Zbl
[37] Towards a mathematical definition of Coulomb branches of 3-dimensional gauge theories. I, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., Volume 20 (2016) no. 3, pp. 595-669 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[38] Gelfand–Tsetlin modules over with arbitrary characters, J. Algebra, Volume 502 (2018), pp. 328-346 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[39] 2-Kac–Moody algebras (2008) | arXiv | DOI
[40] A Survey on Springer Theory (2013) | arXiv | DOI
[41] Gelfand–Tsetlin Modules: Canonicity and Calculations, Algebr. Represent. Theory, Volume 27 (2024) no. 2, pp. 1405-1455 | DOI | Zbl
[42] Double affine Hecke algebras and affine flag manifolds, I, Affine flag manifolds and principal bundles (Trends in Mathematics), Springer, 2010, pp. 233-289 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[43] A geometric approach to 1-singular Gelfand–Tsetlin -modules, Differ. Geom. Appl., Volume 56 (2018), pp. 155-160 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[44] Coherent sheaves and quantum Coulomb branches I: tilting bundles from integrable systems | arXiv | DOI
[45] Canonical bases and higher representation theory, Compos. Math., Volume 151 (2015) no. 1, pp. 121-166 | DOI | Zbl
[46] Knot invariants and higher representation theory, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 1191, American Mathematical Society, 2017 | DOI | Zbl
[47] Koszul duality between Higgs and Coulomb categories (2019) | arXiv | DOI
[48] Weighted Khovanov–Lauda–Rouquier algebras, Doc. Math., Volume 24 (2019), pp. 209-250 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[49] Three perspectives on categorical symmetric Howe duality (2020) | arXiv | DOI
[50] A quantum Mirković–Vybornov isomorphism, Represent. Theory, Volume 24 (2020) no. 2, pp. 38-84 | DOI | Zbl
[51] Generators for Coulomb branches of quiver gauge theories (2019) | arXiv | DOI
[52] The classical groups: spectral analysis of their finite-dimensional representations, Russ. Math. Surv., Volume 17 (1962) no. 1, pp. 1-94 | DOI | Zbl
Cited by Sources: